arrow Carlisle Journal arrow September 21st 1855 arrow Charge of Insubordination
Charge of Insubordination Print E-mail
 
CHARGE OF INSUBORDINATION OF A  PAUPER
IN LONGTOWN WORKHOUSE.
 

Jane DAVIDSON, a pauper, who appeared with an infant in her arms, was  
charged with insubordination in Longtown Workhouse.
 
James BARTON, the master of the workhouse, stated that on Monday night he  
heard a noise in the day room, or ordinary sitting room, and on proceeding there
 he found the defendant washing clothes. He asked her what all that swearing
was  about, and she made some complaint about ill-treatment. He told her if
she would  not do as she was told she must go to the lock-up until she settled
herself. He  was going to put her in the lock-up, when she said she would not
go, and flew at  him and seized his hair. He had to get two officers to secure
her, and they had  to put the irons on her.
 
Mary MOORE said she was an inmate of the Workhouse. On Monday night  
defendant brought a frock, a shift, and a petticoat, for the child, into the  
wash-house. Witness told her to lay them down, and she did so. The matron then  came
in and seeing the things lying took them up and carried them to where the  
defendant stopped. Witness did not hear what she said to her, but presently  
defendant came back and swore she would have her clothes washed. The mistress  said
she would have no swearing, and defendant then swore again that she would  
have her own clothes. She then took them up and carried them off to her room,  
using a coarse expression. Witness did not know what the mistress had said to  
her. Witness was washing the things in the workhouse when she came in, and she
 took them up saying they were not dirty.
 
The CLERK - Then it was a quarrel, I suppose, whether the things were to be  
washed or not.
 
Mr. REES (to BARTON) - Have you any witnesses of her assaulting you?
 
Complainant - There was no one present but Dr. GRAHAM’s son.
 
The CLERK - For what reason were you putting her in the lock-up?
 
Complainant - For her uproarious manner. So it was reported to me.
 
The CLERK (to Mary MOORE) - Did she touch you?
 
Mary MOORE - She pushed me from the tub, and said the things should be  
washed.
 
The CLERK - I don’t think that was a case for the lock - up; if you had  
ordered her to her room it would have been sufficient. It does not appear that  
the woman was so insubordinate as to require to be locked up.
 
Defendant - No; what I broke the door for was they took my child from me  and
kept it all night. My arms are all black and blue with the irons they put on  
me.
 
The CLERK - Was the child sucking?
 
Defendant - Yes; it is only eleven weeks old. The mistress came and flung  
the child’s clothes at me and said she would not allow them to be washed, and I  
asked what was the reason that other people could get their clothes washed,
and  I could not.
 
Mr. REES - Do you admit putting the irons on her BARTON?
 
Complainant - It was not I, it was a policeman. I deemed it necessary to  
lock her up to keep her quiet.
 
Mr. FARISH - Was the child taken from her?
 
Complainant - Yes, but it was put to a wet nurse we had in the house. We  had
to take a laudanum bottle from her once; we were afraid of her giving it to  
the child.
 
Defendant - I never had any laudanum in my life. Mary MOORE had I?
 
Mary MOORE - Not that I know of.
 
The CLERK (to BARTON) - It is a very wrong thing for you to make such a  
charge in a court of justice. You come here to swear to facts and then you say  
you only have it on representation.
 
Complainant said, he thought it had been the same woman they took the  
laudanum from. He had been master of the workhouse nine months. He was never a  
master of one before.
 
Mr. REES (addressing the defendant) - said, she must not give way to her  
passion, but at the same time the Bench did not think the evidence was strong  
enough to send her to gaol.
 
The Bench then told BARTON that he must be careful not to put irons on in  
the future - especially on a woman.
 
Complainant said it was a very desperate case if the Bench had only seen  it.
It was impossible to describe properly.
 
___________________________________

Transcribed by: Ann Selchick,  02/11/2006

 
< Prev   Next >