Carlisle Patriot
October 25, 1844
Baths for the Poor | Baths for the Poor |
|
|
|
BATHS FOR THE POOR. Among the numerous proposals for promoting the health and comfort of all classes, especially the working classes, few are more important than the establishment of public baths, at such rates of charge as to be acceptable to all, and public wash-houses where the poor may easily and cheaply wash their clothing without rendering their little houses damp and uncomfortable by that necessary operation. The following excellent prospectus has been forwarded to us from London, and we publish it with pleasure, for it merely requires the alteration of the names of places to be perfectly applicable to our case. We earnestly beg the attention of our readers to the facts and arguments it contains: - Pent up by their occupation in the midst of London, a large proportion of its vast population can only, on rare occasions, find time to go to the necessary distance to obtain the advantage of a bath, and the comfort of a clean skin; and when they do so, their difficulties are not at an end. They are now prohibited, by penalties, from bathing in the Thames. The Lea and the Serpentine-rivers are only open to them at particular hours. The warm bath is to them a costly luxury, the price in private establishments being rarely less than one shilling and sixpence, while few mechanics can even afford to part with sixpence as often as the bath would do them good; and it may safely be said, two-thirds of the working classes toil from childhood to the grave without ever enjoying it. To procure a warm bath at home, which is never thought of except when disease makes it necessary, is almost an impossibility. Under these circumstances, it is not surprising they scarcely ever indulge in a practice so essential to health and the full enjoyment of life. In the one close room in which a poor man's family is frequently found to live, even if the wife is lying-in, or there are sick or dying persons in it, the whole of its washing must now be done. There the fire must be made, the water boiled, and the clothes washed, dried, and ironed. It is needless to dilate the misery which this must occasion; and it cannot be doubted, that the habitual dirt of many of the poor is an inevitable necessity resulting from a choice of evils. That great benefit will thus be bestowed on the poor, may reasonably be expected, at the same time that their feeling of independence will not be interfered with. They will pay for what they have, though they will pay far less than the expense of washing at home. For the price of a pint of beer they can have a warm bath, and thus insure the greatest amount of cleanliness which the nature of their daily labour will permit. For the price of a glass of gin, they can be saved all the cost of firing, washing-tubs, irons, ironing-cloths, and the life; and thus they will derive a positive pecuniary benefit while making use of the means which will free them from serious domestic evils. The poor are dirty, partly in consequence of the nature of their employments, but chiefly because they can only be cleaner through a sacrifice of food, or other necessaries, or the poverty of their parents. That this is the fact must be evident to all who are acquainted with our collieries. The miners in coal-pits, although their occupation is one of the dirtiest, are among the cleanest of our population: because, in addition to their wages, they have abundance of coals, and can easily afford the luxury of hot water. It is with them almost a universal practice to change their clothes, and get well washed by the aid of one of their family, immidiately on returning from the pit. Let equal facilities be afforded to the labouring population of London, and it may reasonably be hoped that a similar result will follow; and, as they will be enabled by their greater external cleanliness, to avail themselves of many opportunities afforded by existing institutions, for bettering their condition, which their dirt now almost precludes their enjoying, they will progressively rise in the social and moral scale. In appealing to the inhabitants of London for the means to provide, in a very essential point, for the comfort and welfare of many thousands of its hard-working population, and to supply it with those accommodations for cleanliness which were deemed absolutely indispensible in the cities of antiquity; it is felt that liberality and Christian charity may be confidently relied on, and that a vigorous effort will be made to carry out a plan which has already stood the test of a judicious trial, and been found productive of indisputable benefit. ============================================== LIVERPOOL BATHS. The Corporation of Liverpool have lately built baths and wash houses for their poor, and are on the point of building more, the experience of about two years having satisfied them of the great advantages derived from the use of their existing establishment. In Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen, Dundee, Paisley, Greenock, Bolton, and Ashton-under-Lyne, the example of Liverpool is being more or less followed. The original establishment in Liverpool was small and inconvenient; but under all its disadvantages, and notwithstanding its first year was of course little better than exerimental, the number of baths taken by the poor was more than 10,500, and the number of articles washed exceeded 231,000. In the second year the number of baths exceeded 12,600, and the articles washed 305,000. During the first year and part of the second, the charge for the baths [the use of the towel inclusive] was - for a cold bath one penny, and for a warm bath two pence. During the latter part of the second year the charges were raised respectively to two-pence and three-pence. At the wash houses poor women have the use of washing tubs, with an ample supply of hot and cold water, the clothes being first boiled to soften the dirt. When washed they are rapidly dried in a hot room, and then conveniences are afforded for ironing them. The charge at the wash-houses was originally one penny, but has been lately raised to two-pence for every six hours' use of a tub. It is understood that six hours are in general sufficient for washing the clothes, &c of one family. In a detached building is a wash-house, for clothes and other articles which have been used by persons in fever or suffering under infectious disorders. On the certificate of any medical man, they are washed free from charge to the poor; and at an expense of about £10 during the two years, a great benefit has been thus conferred. Care is taken to prevent infection by the use of chlorides, &c. Detailed returns respecting these baths and wash-houses will be found in the Appendix to the first Report of the Health of Towns' Commission, page 195, where it is stated that the annual cost of the establishment is £281 6s; and that the income of the first year was £159 11s 1d, and of the second £280 2s 6d; so that it is now almost self-supporting. It is now proposed to carry out in London, on an extensive scale, the plan of which the success and usefulness has been so fully confirmed. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| The Westmorland Gazette |
| Kendal Times |
| The Penrith Observer |
| Penrith Herald |
| Mid Cumberland & North Westmorland Herald |