|
Death at Whitehaven Harbour |
|
|
|
The Whitehaven News -
November, 27th 1913
|
|
Page 3 of 3 (Part 3) (Death Whitehaven harbour) ~~~ Wm GRAHAM labourer 3 Admiralty Court, Whitehaven, said he was working with NORWOOD, and was only three or four feet from him when he fell. He helped to recover the body and saw a mark on NORWOOD'S head. NORWOOD was all right he was while working. By the inspector: he assisted in putting the staging together, and he should think the width would be eight or nine feet. There was quite sufficient room. Witness landed the first lot of bags and had little difficulty. Jas HODGSON, labourer, 14, McGarry's Buildings, who was also engaged at the unloading, said they had to swing the bags in order to land them, and when they landed one of the bags gave a cant over and knocked the deceased over the quay. By the Inspector: The death from the dock edge to the deck of the vessel would be about 20 feet. Dr PRATT said he was sent for, and found NORWOOD lying on the quay. The mans was dead, and there was an extensive scalp wound on the back of the head, which was practically all that one could see. He should say there was probably a fracture of the base of the skull. The coroner, reviewing the evidence, said that as regarded the staging there seemed to be some contradiction. The evidence of HOY in fact, was strongly contradicted by FARRER, whose evidence was corroborated by the witness Graham. Mr PATTINSON, in reply to the Foreman said the two stages were at lest each four feet wide. That would be eight feet all together. The inspector: I did not measure them but I am inclined to agree with Mr PATTINSON that the stages are four feet wide. In reply to the Foreman the witness FARRER said the chain was on the bag when it canted. There was always a difficulty in landing the bags, even when the tide was in. He consided that the derrick was too short for the job. The jury returned a verdict to the effect that death was due to fracture of the skull, caused by accidental fall from the quay. Mr PATTINSON said he desired to express deep regret on behalf of the firm. Not only hid brother and himself but the whole of their assistants extended their sympathy to the relatives of NORWOOD; who had worked for the firm for twelve or fifteen years and was a good steady man-the sort of man one did not like to lose. He could assure the relatives that this sad accident had been a great blow to the staff.
|