- Details
- Transcribed by unknown author unknown author
- Edition: Thursday, May 6th, 1897 Thursday, May 6th, 1897
Mr WATSON objected that the proposition passed at the previous meeting with
reference to the Braystones road dispute was not recorded properly, inasmuch
as it stated merely that the matter had been referred to the Works
Committee, and urged that it should have been "with instructions to hear
evidence on the other side."-- Mr BROWN said the reference to the Works
Committee was comprehensive enough to allow them to take evidence on both
sides.-- Mr WATSON said he was content if it was understood that they would
take evidence on both sides. -- The Clerk said the committee were not going
to write to the Railway Company and ask them what their case was. They would
take such evidence as they could get.