arrow The Times arrow 1831 - 1840 arrow Nov 18 1831 Cumberland County Meeting #4
Nov 18 1831 Cumberland County Meeting #4 Print E-mail
The Times, Friday, Nov 18, 1831; pg. 1; Issue 14699; col C


                          CUMBERLAND COUNTY MEETING.
                                           ---------------------
                                               (From the Sun.)     [continued]

The Rev. E. STANLEY said, that in those times of tergiversation and vacillation
too little had been said in praise of that consistency which had been shown by
Earl GREY through a long political life. Through good report and through bad
report he had held on the even tenour of his way, and struggled for these
principles in his youth, which now, in age, he strongly advocated, and showed
how deeply he was impressed with the vital necessity of reform. He (Mr. STANLEY)
remembered the noble earl when he stood forward at the head of a society called
Friends of the People, and it might now fairly be said, that after a lapse of 40
years, he was again at the head of the friends of the people - he meant His
Majesty's present Ministers. (Cheers.) The unfortunate and inauspicious
rejection of the bill by the House of Lords had led to the present meeting, that
the Lords might be taught that there was no re-action in public feeling, as had
been falsely asserted. If the people had been passive since the last election -
if the crew had rested upon their oars, it was because they had stemmed the
torrent, and might quietly swim with the stream. When the necessity for a
different line of conduct had arisen, they had shown themselves ready to meet
it. (Applause.) No man who knew Earl GREY, or had watched the conduct of his
colleagues, could doubt that a bill equally efficient as the last would be
brought forward - ("We will take nothing less") - and there could be little fear
of the Lords again venturing to set themselves in hostile array against the
nation. The new bill would be the twin-brother of that which had been thrown
out; and the only alteration which he (Mr. STANLEY) contemplated in its features
was that, as the younger born, it might bear upon its front the mark of the
census of 1831; but that, he imagined, would not generally be looked upon as an
unfavourable mark. (Applause.) It had been said, that if Earl GREY were sincere,
he would show it by cresting a number of peers; but Mr. HOWARD had shown how
dangerous might be such a precedent. It was scarcely to be hoped that we should
always have upon the throne a King so patriotic as he who now filled that seat
of honour; and a despotic Sovereign might turn against the people a precedent
that had been established for their protection. His good friend, Mr. JAMES, had
spoken somewhat harshly against the bishops, and the cloth of which he (Mr.
STANLEY) was an unworthy member. ("He could not say too ill of the bishops.")
But he must be allowed to say that there were good and bad men in all
professions; though he most sincerely regretted the part the bishops had taken
upon this important measure. It was highly impolitic, but he hoped in future
they would see the necessity of opposing themselves as strenuously to the
corruptions in temporalities as they were bound to show themselves in matters
purely spiritual. ("Oh, they're a bad gang.") A vote of thanks was but a poor
return to Earl GREY and his colleagues for all their labours and anxieties; but
it would show them how their services were appreciated by the country, and that
would no doubt be some consolation for the fatigues they underwent. The rev.
gentleman concluded by cordially seconding the vote of thanks and confidence in
Ministers.

The motion was put and carried unanimously, and with three cheers.

WM. WYBERG, Esq., of Isell-hall, then stood forward to move the thanks of the
meeting to the two county members, Sir J. GRAHAM and Mr. BLAMIRE. With respect
to Sir James, they would recollect that, besides attending nightly to his duties
in the House of Commons, he had to attend to pay strict attention to the
Admiralty office, and give his advice and assistance as a member of His
Majesty's Council. With respect to Mr. BLAMIRE, he had fully redeemed all the
pledges he had given on the hustings at Cockermouth, and though his labours had
been very great, he was glad to see him look so well, and apparently so able to
battle again with the boroughmongers. (Cheers.) With respect to the bench of
Bishops ("Oh, away with them,") he was not prepared to say that he blamed them
more than the other Lords who had voted against the bill; but this he was
prepared to say and to contend, that the bishops ought not to have seats in that
house. (Much cheering.) They would much better fulfil their missions by staying
at home in their respective dioceses, and watching their flocks. It was
monstrous that 199 persons should have the power to oppose the will of a
gracious King, and the wishes of a whole people, expressed in a way that ought
not to have been misunderstood, and could not be misinterpreted. It was
certainly noble to have a giant's strength, but oh, it was tyrannous to use it
like a giant.

MITHAM HARTLEY, Esq., of Gill-foot, said, that being an individual who had
signed the requisition, he felt it to be his duty to attend, and had much
pleasure in seconding the resolution. Ever since he was the size of the umbrella
which he held in his hand, he had been a reformer; and to those who did not know
what reform meant, he would tell them. (Cheers and laughter.) It was simply a
change from worse to better. (Great cheers.) And why, he would ask, ought not
such a boon to be granted?

WILLIAM BLAMIRE, Esq., M.P., at considerable length, returned thanks for himself
and his colleague, who, he said, was allowed, by those who were best able to
judge, to be the best First Lord of the Admiralty that ever filled the
situation, and he must say it was an honour to Cumberland to have a member
belonging to her filling a situation in the Cabinet, and who had a head to
direct and a hand to guide the thunders of the Britsh Navy, with credit to
himself, and with satisfaction to his country. (Cheers.) For himself, he was not
aware he was deserving of thanks. (Cheers, and cries of "You are, you are.") He
had been selected from humble life, and sent to Parliament, for an express
purpose, and to perform a specific duty - a duty which, he trusted, he had not
lost sight of (cheers); for, although he had not been able to do much as
regarded the provisions of the bill, yet he had not been absent from one single
division upon the reform question. True, he had not said much upon it, but he
thought he had acted a more judicious part, because he saw that they only were
the best friends of the people who said least, and voted most. (Loud cheers.)
However, the thanks which he had received from them that day would serve to
relieve those harrassing and fatiguing hours which he must have to pass, before
he heard that wished for sound, "that this bill do now pass." (Cheers.) But, if
he was sent to Parliament to assist in carrying reform, he had returned ten
times more convinced of the necessity of it. (Cheers.) He could see no good that
would accrue to the country until reform had been gained. (Cheers.) He had seen
and even voted for grants of public money, which his conscience told him he
ought not to have done; but he did it for the sake of expediency, under the hope
that, when this bill was carried, a different course would be persevered in.
(Cheers.) But while he said this, he did not blame the present Ministers for it;
many grants which had been passed had been for sums expended by the late
Ministers. (Hear, hear.) He had the greatest confidence in the present Ministry,
for he believed that their professions of economy and retrenchment would be
carried into effect in a reformed Parliament. He called upon the people not to
despair, even if the bill should again be rejected by the Lords - ("We will," -
"They dare not," - "Let them do it if they dare,") - because, he believed that
Parliament would then be dissolved, and the King would suspend the writs for the
rotten boroughs, and issue new ones for those places enumerated under the new
bill. (Immense cheering, which lasted for some time.) And why not? It would not
be a breaking up of the constitution, as had been said by some, but a
renovation. (Cheers.) The law said no peers should interfere with elections, and
what right do the peers have to interfere with the House of Commons, when they
wish to enforce that law? ("None;" loud cheers.) He hoped and believed that that
course would be adopted, and then the boroughmongers might do their worst.
(Cheers and laughter.) In answer to a person in the crowd, Mr. BLAMIRE then
stated his reasons for voting against the Truck Bill, which he designated as
being absurd in principle, and impracticable in detail; and concluded by
exhorting the people to be peaceable and firm, and he had no doubt that victory
would speedily crown their exertions. (Great cheering.) Danger, it had been
said, would follow the passing of the bill; but he was of opinion that more
awaited its rejection. (Applause.)

J. DIXON, Esq., of Knells, said he had been called upon to move a vote of thanks
to the two members for the city of Carlisle, Mr. JAMES and Mr. P. H. HOWARD, and
he did so with great pleasure. They had done their duty manfully and
efficiently, and had thus rescued the city from the disgrace of sending members
who were either the nominees of Lord LONSDALE, or who neutralized each other's
votes by opposite votes upon every vital question. He was satisfied that the
passing of the Reform Bill would be of the greatest advantage to the commercial
interests of the country. (Cheers.)

J. FERGUSON, Esq., of Carlisle, seconded the motion in an able and impressive
speech, which we are sorry time forbids us to report.

Mr. JAMES again stood forward to return thanks, and was received with three
cheers, and spoke with much energy. In what he had said about the church he did
not mean to include the hard-working clergy. The bishops opposed reform, because
they knew a reformed Parliament would not grant them money to build churches,
which they ought to do out of their own revenues, as well as feed the poor, for
which the tithes were originally granted. (Immense cheering.)

 
< Prev   Next >