arrow The Times arrow 1821 - 1830 arrow Sept 06 1821 Carlisle Summer Assizes #8
Sept 06 1821 Carlisle Summer Assizes #8 Print E-mail
The Times, Thursday, Sep 06, 1821; pg. 3; Issue 11344; col B


                                            SUMMER ASSIZES.
                                                   -------------
                          CARLISLE, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 1.

     BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. - THOMPSON V. BLAMIRE.

So great was the anxiety to hear this trial, that from eight in the morning till
two in the afternoon the Court was excessively crowded, while the merest
questions of abstract right which Dandy Dinmont could wish to litigate were
discussed. At length THOMPSON and BLAMIRE was announced, and the Jury was sworn.

Mr. TINDALL opened the pleadings in the usual form.

Mr. BROUGHAM. - You have heard from my learned friend, who opened the pleadings
generally, what the nature of this action is. It is now my duty to state the
circumstances which gave it birth. Miss Sarah THOMPSON is the daughter of a very
respectable man, a Mr. THOMPSON, who lives not far from this place, and near
Scotby. I would wish that any of you, or all of you, were from that
neighbourhood, in which this gentleman and his daughter live, because, if you
had known the father by familiar intercourse, if you had known his reputation
for probity and general respectability, it would be sufficient protection for
me, in case any such attempts as are sometimes made to cast any imputations on
the character of this plaintiff should now be offered. The defendant is a young
gentleman, son of a gentleman of considerable property, Mr. BLAMIRE, of
Suttle-house. I should mention that he is his natural son, but he was brought up
in his family, and no difference was ever discovered, or is now seen, between
him and a legitimate son. The defendant seemed to have considerable means at his
disposal, and his habits at least showed no lack of resources. In 1815 the
defendant became intimately acquainted in Mr. THOMPSON's family. Miss THOMPSON
is a young lady of considerable personal accomplishments. An intimacy began
early to be formed between her and the defendant, and in course of one or two
years it became manifest to her father. It naturally soon became much talked of
in the neighbourhood. They became warmly attached, and the neighbours considered
them as about to become man and wife. The parent then began to feel what was
perfectly natural, but what he cannot be blamed for not having expressed
earlier, an anxiety to know whether his daughter was fairly dealt with. He asked
Mr. BLAMIRE, the defendant, what were his intentions? His answer was perfectly
natural - "If ever he married any person, he would marry his daughter." Mr.
THOMPSON considered it his duty to put the same question again. He promised
distinctly to make Miss THOMPSON his wife. Now, gentlemen, there is not the
slightest pretence for insinuating the slightest imputation on Miss THOMPSON's
character, or for insinuating that she has done any thing unworthy of the purest
female delicacy, or what would reduce in any degree the damages which I now
claim. Gentlemen, I mean to say in plain terms, that she did not what would now
greatly diminish her claim - abandon her virtue in her intercourse with her
lover. During the life of Mr. BLAMIRE's father, it might be thought inconvenient
for the marriage to take place; but some time afterwards the declared lover was
again asked whether he meant to fulfil his engagement, and he repeated his
warmest love and affection for Miss THOMPSON. But he had in course of time
shown, what his letters to the plaintiff indicated, a feeling for himself which
occasioned the breach of his promise, and caused the present action. Other views
opened upon him, and he married another lady, a Miss OLIVER, a lady of large
present fortune, and larger expectations. In point of character and
respectability Miss THOMPSON, to whom he vowed the strongest attachment, and
whom he afterwards abandoned because she was inferior in fortune, and in that
alone, Miss THOMPSON may defy comparison with Miss OLIVER.




 
< Prev   Next >