arrow The Times arrow 1821 - 1830 arrow Oct 21 1823 Parcel Theft Case #6
Oct 21 1823 Parcel Theft Case #6 Print E-mail
The Times, Tuesday, Oct 21, 1823; pg. 3; Issue 12008; col A


                              ANOTHER REPORT
                    [From the Carlisle Patriot.]
                    PUBLIC-OFFICE, TOWN-HALL.    

John ALLEN, clerk of the coach-office at Glasgow, was next sworn. He had not
previously made any deposition. The way-bill on the the 12th, now produced, is
partly in my hand-writing; the entry of the parcel for the Editor of The Times
was written by me. I remember that it was brought to the office on the 12th, by
Mr. M'ADAM and another man. I saw it put into the box and locked up, and I had
the key. There are only two keys; one I keep, and the other is kept in Carlisle,
where the box is first opened. Only small parcels are put into this box. I saw
those for the Herald and The Times, both put in at the same time. The other
clerks and porters could not take out the parcel without my seeing them.

Mr. DOWLING. - It is necessary for the magistrates to remember, that the box was
broken open by the boy, in Carlisle, on account, as he said, of the key being
lost.

By Mr. HENSON. - The York parcel omitted was a large one; we frequently omit
heavy luggage, when too full, till next day, though entered in the way-bill.

The information of Mr. HICKS was then read. He described himself as of
Printing-house-square, London, and one of the proprietors of The Times. Mr.
PRENTICE, of the Glasgow Chronicle had been directed to forward a report of the
dinner given to Mr. BROUGHAM in that city, which report never reached its
destination, because, as deponent believed, it had been taken from the
mail-coach-office at Carlisle, by Mr. DOWLING.

Mr. HENSON. - That's my case. I must leave the question of commitment to the
magistrates.

Mr. HICKS. - I think it proper to observe that the depositions are in the hands
of the editor and other proprietors of The Times, and if they should say any
thing in the meantime on this subject, I beg it may not be understood as a
violation of the request made by the magistrates here to-day, because I can have
no control at this distance. I shall write to-night and acquaint them with what
I have promised.

The Magistrates retired for about a quarter of an hour, and on their return
asked Mr. DOWLING if he had bail, thereby intimating that they thought the case
should go before a jury.

Mr. DOWLING. - I have no bail here. I have been brought from Birmingham at a
moment's notice; I could not consult my friends. I apprehend that bail is not
material. No man knows me and my connexions better than Mr. HICKS there, who has
often partaken of the hospitality of my father's table. I have a house in town
and an office, for which I pay 200 guineas annual rent; I hold a public
situation; have a brother a barrister, am well known to most public men in town;
and, moreover, have a wife and seven children; therefore no fear can be
entertained that I shall evade such a charge as this. So far as assertion goes
(though I am aware that my word in such a situation cannot set aside that which
has been stated on oath), I solemnly declare that I never saw nor heard of the
packet until charged as you now see. I came to Carlisle from Glasgow on the
12th, and sat up all night at the coffee-house, writing out the report of the
dinner, in order to send it off by the mail. I could not possibly have any
motive for taking such a parcel; it would have been valueless to me; I would
rather have seen The Times publish its contents, as I said before, in order to
have enjoyed the contrast.

Mr. HICKS. - I beg to observe that Mr. DOWLING's statement as to his connexions
and respectability is perfectly correct, and that I never heard any thing to his
prejudice till this charge. We wish not to do any thing harshly.

Mr. HENSON said he should not object to Mr. SAUL being his client's bail; and
Mr. SAUL accordingly entered into recognizance in 30L. Mr. DOWLING also gave
personal recognizance, and the witnesses were bound over to appear. Finally it
was agreed that the trial should not come on at the county sessions which
commenced at Penrith on Tuesday. Mr. HENSON said he would prefer his bill; and
if found, he would not then oppose Mr. DOWLING's motion for a postponement to
any future time. If the other side chose, he would let the trial take place at
the next assizes.

The reason why Mr. DOWLING was apprehended at Birmingham, Mr. HENSON stated, was
this - the warrant was sent to London, where they thought Mr. DOWLING was, and
having been put into the hands of RUTHVEN, he deemed it his duty to follow Mr.
DOWLING to that town, and to bring him to Carlisle, where he knew he (Mr.
HENSON) and Mr. HICKS were. There was no wish to annoy Mr. DOWLING, nor to
deprive him of every assistance that he might be able to procure.

Both parties proceeded to the Quarter Sessions, which commenced at Penrith (18
miles from Carlisle) on the following day. Mr. DOWLING and his Solicitor were on
the alert. They went before the grand jury as soon as they entered  upon their
duties, and preferred a bill against all the parties mentioned in the
public-office investigation for a conspiracy. Mr. DOWLING himself addressed them
with considerable effect, reiterating his complaint of malicious prosecution on
account of successful rivalry, and urged them to cross-examine the boy MURRAY
with great care, in order to detect the inconsistencies and improbabilities of
his story. After the way had thus been skilfully prepared, the prosecuting party
came up with their bill; the examination was a rigid one; and the result, that
both were thrown out. Mr. DOWLING hailed his triumph with great glee: in the
exultation of the moment, he even threw up his hat in court. On Wednesday
morning he left Penrith for London. From certain expressions which escaped the
defeated prosecutors, we are led to conclude that the business will not end
here.

                                             ______________________

 The following year, DOWLING took Mr.
HICKS to court for malicious prosecution - that article will follow later.

 
< Prev   Next >